‘Abby,’ was responsible for '#milifandom's' inception. This ‘one
direction-esque,’ ‘throw your pants in the air like you just don’t care’ mania,
has brought The Sun newspaper to her door. Only, how did they find her? The Sun
tracked down Abby’s home and that of her grandparents for comment of the ‘#milifandom’
movement. The reporters cited the electoral roll as the source which lead them
to the front door, an impossibility as Abby wasn’t registered. So the Sun, who
are currently under inquiry, presumably unethically obtained the respective
location of both Abby and her Grandparents from her online activity, through
twitter. Is obtaining comment on the ‘#millifandom’ affair really worth such an
ethical breach?
a few days prior to this one I wrote on the subject of press
bias and whether or not press influence can affect voter turnout (Saturday, May
2nd.) Whatever your view on our mainstream media, I wonder whether campaign
executives are concerned about the rise in social media and other online
platforms and their ability to reach our nation in a way that they just don’t
understand.
The News Corp media mogul Rupert
Murdoch has a 34% share of the domestic newspaper market and has been known to
play an active role in the direction of entities like the Sun. However, as his
overall market share is effectively diluted with the continued growth of new
digital media, could it be that the Sun and indeed all those media entities
under Rupert’s grasp would begin a subtle affront on a leftist message, that ‘monopolism’
is bad, and is Abby’s run in with News Corp the beginning of this?
Ed Miliband told the Leveson
inquiry into press freedoms earlier this year that he believed in much lower
ownership limits and re-bolstered his views during his kitchen date with Russell.
This being said it is clear that the mogul would see the prospect of a more
leftist government as a threat to his power but it is unclear as to why the Sun
newspaper sees the online wittering of teenage girls as a threat.