Tuesday, 28 April 2015

On immigration: Are UKIP really that different from Labour?

When I heard Labour’s announcements on Immigration this morning, two thoughts leaped into my mind. The first was, ‘finally the labour campaign are facing this issue which, as polls suggest are vitally important to the electorate. In February of last year You Gov found that 65% of the public were worried about the level of immigration to the UK. My second thought was can this Labour announcement finish the UKippers off and is this policy on immigration fundamentally different from Labour’s anyway?


“UKIP want to leave the EU dummie,” you may say. Well yes, this is a glaring difference in UKIP’s party ethos. However, this difference if anything, could help in highlighting Labour’s and indeed the political establishments (as the ‘Kippers’ like to say,) inequitable approach to immigration policy. As it currently stands and as Peter Hitchin pointed out some weeks ago on the BBC’s Question Time programme, EU migrants are treated under a completely separate legal system as to those from farther jurisdictions. Non-EU migrants are considered under EU law as EU citizens which is fantastic for them. However, due to high levels of immigration the last coalition government effected policies which have led to a silly mess. Non-EU spouses require an annual income of over £18,600 before they can be with their partners and cuts to the student visa scheme has probably inadvertently affected productivity and helped build our skills deficit. It must be stated that Non-EU Immigration has actually quite significantly by 52,000 in 2014 but this is ‘by the by’ when looking at the polls on voter concerns. If UKIP’s prospective candidates bang the drum on this ethical discrepancy in Labour immigration policy, it will no doubt resonate with voters.

Labour want also to tackle inequalities in the unskilled work force by, and I quote, ‘Making it illegal for employers to undercut British workers.’ Isn’t that that what UKIP want, in a round about way through their supposed points based system? Now I am not making a judgement about whether either policy is legitimate. I have barely examined where the money is coming from. However I think that the differences in policy on immigration between the Labour Party and UKIP are slim. It is more a question of perception, voter perception, and UKIP have been nudged by all parties into the role of the ‘Nasty Party 2.0’

With ill-advised comments on benefit tourism, HIV, ‘Bongo Bongo Land,’ and ‘half blacks,’ it’s no surprise everyone went to town on UKIP for being the ‘Racist Party.’ However, fundamentally on the question of immigration policy I would say their comments have been rather less ‘off colour,’ than those of Labour’s immigration spokesperson Yvette Cooper, as she stumbled yesterday over the question of taking in asylum seekers from the Mediterranean. In short Labour don’t want them here. Nigel Farage may distinctly lack eloquence when he speaks his mind but is he really any different from any other senior politician, they are all quite good at gaffs